Wiki source code of XWiki competitors

Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2022/08/22 13:25

Show last authors
1 Discussion: [[Comparing XWiki to other solutions>>http://markmail.org/message/b52kamkbyoml55qx]]
2
3 = XWiki competitors list =
4
5 Here is the list of XWiki competitors coming from the community:
6
7 |=Name |=Editor |=Type |=Licence |=Links |=Pros and Cons against XWiki |=Kind of competition
8 |Confluence |Atlassian |Wiki | |[[Website>>http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/]]| |Direct
9 |Foswiki | Foswiki community|Wiki |GPL2 or later|[[Website>>http://foswiki.org/]] |very similar to XWiki: wiki+ structured data + programmable pages. Claims to have best-in-class security and WYSIWYG. |Direct
10 |TWiki | |Wiki | |[[Website>>http://twiki.org/]]| |\\
11 |DekiWiki |Mindtouch |Wiki | |[[Website>>http://developer.mindtouch.com/Deki]] | |\\
12 |MediaWiki | |Wiki | |[[Website>>http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki]] | |Direct
13 |TikiWiki | |Wiki | |[[Website>>http://info.tiki.org/Tiki+Wiki+CMS+Groupware]] | |\\
14 |CubeTree | |Wiki | |[[Website>>https://www.cubetree.com/]] | |\\
15 |Drupal | |CMS | |[[Website>>http://drupal.org/]] | |Medium
16 |Exo Platform |Exo |CMS | |[[Article>>http://www.slideshare.net/xwiki/wiki-vs-cms-1714023]] | |Indirect
17 |Social Text | |CMS | |[[Website>>http://www.socialtext.com/]] | |\\
18 |Jive |Jive Software |Discussion | |[[Website>>http://www.jivesoftware.com/]] | |Complementary
19 |Google Site |Google |CMS | |[[Website>>http://sites.google.com]] | |Indirect
20 |Google Docs |Google |DMS | |[[Website>>http://docs.google.com]] | |Direct
21 |BlueKiwi | |Discussion | |[[Website>>http://www.bluekiwi-software.com/]] | |Direct
22 |Joomla | |CMS | |[[Website>>http://www.joomla.org/]] | |\\
23 |Moodle | |Education CMS | |[[Website>>http://moodle.org/]] | |\\
24 |Elgg | |Social Network | Open Source|[[Website>>http://elgg.org/]] | |\\
25 |OpenCMS | |CMS | |[[Website>>http://www.opencms.org]] | |\\
26 |Knowledge Plaza | | | |[[Website>>http://www.knowledgeplaza.net/]] | |\\
27 |Jamespot Pro | |Social Network | |[[Website>>http://www.jamespot.pro/]] | |\\
28 |Yoolink Pro | |Social Network | |[[Website>>http://www.yoolinkpro.com/]] | |\\
29 |SeeMy | |Social Network | |[[Website>>http://www.seemy.eu/fr/]] | |\\
30 |Teamshaker | |Social Network | |[[Website>>http://www.teamshaker.com/]] | |\\
31 |Liferay | |Groupware | |[[Website>>http://www.liferay.com/]] | |\\
32 |BlackBoard | | | |[[Website>>http://www.blackboard.com/]] | |\\
33 |Alfresco | |CMS | |[[Website>>http://www.blackboard.com/]] | |\\
34 |Personall | |Portal | |[[Website>>http://www.personall-software.com/J/]] | |\\
35 |Jalios | |Social network | |[[Website>>http://www.jalios.com/]] | |\\
36 |Silverpeas| |Portal |Open Source |[[Website>>http://www.silverpeas.com/]] | |\\
37 |Portaneo| |Portal |Open Source |[[Website>>http://website.portaneo.com/]] | |\\
38 |Lotus Notes|IBM |Groupware | |[[Website>>http://www.alfresco.com/]] | |Direct
39 |SharePoint|Microsoft |Groupware | |[[Website>>http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/]] |(((
40 * Pos:
41 ** Integrated as filesystem in Microsoft Office suite
42 * Cons:
43 ** More an HTTP file-system than content manager
44 )))|Direct
45 |AFFiNE|AFFiNE||Open Source|[[Website>>https://affine.pro/]]|
46
47 = Known comparison sites =
48
49 * Social Software Matrix: http://socialsoftwarematrix.org/
50 * USEO repository: http://communaute.useo.fr/home/login?referer=%2Fhome
51 * http://www.wikimatrix.org/
52
53 = Known used criterias to compare solutions =
54
55 |=Criteria |=Weight|= Comment
56 |Backend system requirements |critical|
57 |Extensibility |very high| The ability to add features through some sort of add ons.
58 |WYSIWYG Editor / Ease of access |very high|
59 |Usability and ergonomy |very high|
60 |MS Office Import Feature |very high| The ability to import Documents,Spreadsheets, etc directly to the wiki as a page
61 |Performance / Resources in client |high| The efficient use of web technology to keep the impact lw on the end user device. Important for the ever increasing mobile device population. Efficient use of database resources
62 |Cost |high| The cost of not only the software but also the cost of the implementation and operational costs after implementation
63 |Search |high| Ability to search not just pages, but also attachments
64 |User Management |high| Ease of setup of new users, integration to directory services, such as OpenLDAP, OpenID, Facebook, Microsoft AD
65 |Consulting / Professional support / Training |high| Availability of resources locally and via the internet for any services to support a wiki
66 |Attachments, images, etc. |high| Easy of attaching single and multiple images, and other attachments, creating galleries, adding to galleries
67 |Maintenance of the backend |high| Log Management, Database management
68 |Branding |medium| Ability to and ease of adding logo's and other artifacts such as colours to create a desired effect
69 |Categories |medium|
70 |Templates (for Site Layout) |medium|
71 |PDF Export |medium|
72 |Themes, Skins, Customizations |low|
73 |Versioning |low|
74 |Plug-Ins |low|
75 |Latex formulas |low|
76 |Comments |low|
77 |Unicode Support (e.g. for Chinese characters) |low|
78 |Localization |low|

Get Connected