IRC Archive for channel #xwiki on 08 January 2009
Last modified by Vincent Massol on 2012/10/18 18:30
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 00:00): XWiki.CarlBurke was modified by XWiki.CarlBurke (Created user) - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/CarlBurke
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 03:00): XWiki.AbbotKinney was modified by XWiki.AbbotKinney (Created user) - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/AbbotKinney
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 03:05): XWiki.AbbotKinney was modified by XWiki.AbbotKinney - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/AbbotKinney
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 03:05): XWiki.AbbotKinney was modified by XWiki.AbbotKinney - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/AbbotKinney
vmassol - (08/01/2009 08:53): npm: 1.7.1 is now planned for today
vmassol - (08/01/2009 08:53): (was delayed a bit due to christmas holidays)
vmassol - (08/01/2009 08:53): re 1.8 yes these are good
vmassol - (08/01/2009 08:53): unless you want the standalone version
vmassol - (08/01/2009 08:53): which you can also get as snapshot
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 11:03): XWiki.til was modified by XWiki.til (Created user) - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/til
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 11:06): References.iDiva was modified by XWiki.til - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/References/iDiva
xwikibot - (08/01/2009 11:10): References.iDiva was modified by XWiki.til - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/References/iDiva
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:39): vmassol: Quick question: isEmpty in interface ConfigurationSource means there is no property defined in the source ?
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:39): (there is no javadoc for it ;))
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:40): I meant ;)
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:40): let me check
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:40): boolean isEmpty();
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:40): yes it means there's not property defined
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:40): ok
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:40): thank you
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:40): probably not used yet anymore
asyd - (08/01/2009 17:41): hello there!
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:41): s/anymore/anwyehre/
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:41): hi asyd
asyd - (08/01/2009 17:41): just a little question, are attachments can be indexed by lucence?
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:41): vmassol: we agree it is equivalent to getKeys().isEmpty(); ?
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:42): ah yes I modeled it around Commons configuration
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:42): let me check the javadoc for commoents configuration
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:42): commons
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:43): http://commons.apache.org/configuration/apidocs/org/apache/commons/configuration/Configuration.html
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:43): jvelociter: so it's different from what I was saying
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:44): I guess you can remove isEmpty() for now
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:46): ok
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:46): well
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:46): it says "true if the configuration contains no property, false otherwise."
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:47): so it is actually getKeys().isEmpty();
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:47): I'll remove isEmpty
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:48): but if we do that, we cannot have isEmpty in the commons conf adapter
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:48): I guess it's not big a deal
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:48): (vmassol)
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:49): sorry, actually we need it if we extend AbstractConfiguration from commons
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:49): that would explain why you've put it in the interface in the first place
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:49): jvelociter: I don't understand
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): oh yes
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:50): you've writte a wrapper around a XWiki conf into a Commons Configuration one
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): I remember now
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): that's why I did it
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:50): s/writte/written
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): :)
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): so it just needs to be documented
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:50): so, we can keep it
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:50): yes
vmassol - (08/01/2009 17:50): yes
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:54): asyd: yes, I think so
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:54): (the attachments)
asyd - (08/01/2009 17:54): hmm, ok
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:55): the experimental lucene search returns results from attachments
asyd - (08/01/2009 17:55): ok, nice!
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 17:55): now, I don't know which format it supports exactly
vmassol - (08/01/2009 18:07): jvelociter:, asyd : PDF, MS word, MS PPT, MS Excel, OO, XML, plain text
jvelociter - (08/01/2009 18:08): vmassol: thanks :)
asyd - (08/01/2009 18:08): ok, thanks
asyd - (08/01/2009 18:08): perfect
npm - (08/01/2009 20:04): vmassol -- thanks for letting me know of today's 1.7.1 release ... perhaps i'll have enough issues as-is and i'll install 1.7.1 and try 1.8 w/o a deadline threatening.
vmassol - (08/01/2009 21:46): npm: the release might be delayed to tomorrow... I'm still fixing one bug and I don't think I'll have finished tonight
npm - (08/01/2009 21:47): thanks for letting me know this... i was just deciding i'll try http://maven.xwiki.org/snapshots/com/xpn/xwiki/products/xwiki-enterprise-web/1.8-SNAPSHOT/xwiki-enterprise-web-1.8-20090108.180739-399.war figuring the new wysiwyg improvements in 1.7.1 are already in that snapshot...
vmassol - (08/01/2009 21:48): npm: that's correct
vmassol - (08/01/2009 21:48): everything is in the trunk (i.e. 1.8)
npm - (08/01/2009 21:54): will there be a 1.7.1-based xem release coming soon too? latest currently is 1.6.2 based...
jvdrean - (08/01/2009 22:18): npm: yes, it will probably be shipped next week
npm - (08/01/2009 22:18): cool. thanks
npm - (08/01/2009 23:07): will http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Virtualization and/or http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/FAQ/HowToSetupVirtualWikis continue to work the same way in 1.8 snapshot as currently documented. Will Wiki Manager Plugin and Application
npm - (08/01/2009 23:07): suggested by "Simply install Wiki Manager Plugin and Wiki Manager Application and follow instructions." work in 1.8 snap