Last modified by Paul Libbrecht on 2022/02/25 09:25

From version 2.1
edited by Paul Libbrecht
on 2019/02/01 08:03
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.1
edited by Paul Libbrecht
on 2019/02/01 08:03
Change comment: forgotten bracket. It now looks inviting, I think.

Summary

Details

GoogleSummerOfCode.ProjectClass[0]
Details
... ... @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
6 6  
7 7  * what is stored in the index for each document (index explorer)
8 8  * why a given query yielded a given document and with what score (based on the Solr explain)
9 -* adjustments to the weighting of individual fields (e.g. using the [[eDisMax query parser>>https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#the-extended-dismax-query-parser]]
9 +* adjustments to the weighting of individual fields (e.g. using the [[eDisMax query parser>>https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#the-extended-dismax-query-parser]])
10 10  * how the indexing process (e.g. the language-specific features) transforms and stores pages and documents (combining what Solr and XWiki does)
11 11  
12 12  Search quality evaluation is a traditional field of information retrieval. More can be read about it [[in the IR Book>>https://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/html/htmledition/evaluation-in-information-retrieval-1.html]] or in the summary of [[K Manesh>>https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/enterprise-edition/imt-quality-092464.html]].

Get Connected